Xeon w9-3595X vs X3320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3320
2008
95 Watt
1.25
Xeon w9-3595X
2024
60 cores / 120 threads, 385 Watt
62.95
+4936%

Xeon w9-3595X outperforms Xeon X3320 by a whopping 4936% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3320 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking230913
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.42
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.2415.46
Architecture codenameno dataSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3320 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Performance-coresno data60
Threadsno data120
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache112.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3320 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3320 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon X3320 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3320 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3320 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3320 and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3320 1.25
Xeon w9-3595X 62.95
+4936%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3320 1986
Xeon w9-3595X 99993
+4935%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 62.95
Recency 1 January 2008 24 August 2024
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 385 Watt

Xeon X3320 has 305.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has a 4936% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 16 years.

The Xeon w9-3595X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3320 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3320
Xeon X3320
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 41 vote

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3320 or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.