Athlon 64 X2 5600+ vs Xeon X3320

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3320
2008
95 Watt
1.25
+119%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.57

Xeon X3320 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5600+ by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3320 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22992817
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.250.61
Architecture codenameno dataWindsor (2006−2007)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)December 2006 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3320 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data512K
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3320 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775AM2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3320 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3320 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3320 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3320 1.25
+119%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 0.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3320 1986
+120%
Athlon 64 X2 5600+ 903

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 0.57
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 89 Watt

Xeon X3320 has a 119.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+, on the other hand, has 6.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3320 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3320 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3320
Xeon X3320
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Athlon 64 X2 5600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 115 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3320 or Athlon 64 X2 5600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.