Celeron G1620 vs Xeon X3230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3230
2007
95 Watt
1.29
+31.6%
Celeron G1620
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
0.98

Xeon X3230 outperforms Celeron G1620 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3230 and Celeron G1620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22702468
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.291.69
Architecture codenameno dataIvy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 July 2007 (17 years ago)3 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$208

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3230 and Celeron G1620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data94 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3230 and Celeron G1620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3230 and Celeron G1620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon X3230 and Celeron G1620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3230 and Celeron G1620 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3230 and Celeron G1620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X3230 and Celeron G1620 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3230 and Celeron G1620.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3230 1.29
+31.6%
Celeron G1620 0.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3230 2052
+31.5%
Celeron G1620 1560

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 0.98
Recency 1 July 2007 3 December 2012
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon X3230 has a 31.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron G1620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 72.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3230 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3230 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G1620 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3230 and Celeron G1620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3230
Xeon X3230
Intel Celeron G1620
Celeron G1620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 25 votes

Rate Xeon X3230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 84 votes

Rate Celeron G1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3230 or Celeron G1620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.