A4-1200 vs Xeon W3690

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3690 and A4-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1299not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.81no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency3.31no data
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Temash (2013)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3690 and A4-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.46 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3690 and A4-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FT3
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3690 and A4-1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3690 and A4-1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3690 and A4-1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3690 and A4-1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8180

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3690 and A4-1200.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3690 7226
+1858%
A4-1200 369

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W3690 558
+407%
A4-1200 110

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W3690 2601
+1269%
A4-1200 190

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 February 2011 23 May 2013
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 4 Watt

Xeon W3690 has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

A4-1200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 3150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3690 and A4-1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W3690 is a server/workstation processor while A4-1200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3690 and A4-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3690
Xeon W3690
AMD A4-1200
A4-1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 294 votes

Rate Xeon W3690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 40 votes

Rate A4-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3690 or A4-1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.