Celeron 887E vs Xeon W3670

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3670 and Celeron 887E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1402not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.12no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.96no data
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date29 August 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$295no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3670 and Celeron 887E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3670 and Celeron 887E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366no data
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3670 and Celeron 887E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3670 and Celeron 887E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3670 and Celeron 887E are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3670 and Celeron 887E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size24 GB16 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3670 and Celeron 887E.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon W3670 has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron 887E, on the other hand, has 664.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3670 and Celeron 887E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W3670 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 887E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3670 and Celeron 887E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3670
Xeon W3670
Intel Celeron 887E
Celeron 887E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 43 votes

Rate Xeon W3670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 887E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3670 or Celeron 887E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.