E-450 vs Xeon W3580

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3580 and E-450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1805not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.83no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.66no data
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date9 August 2009 (15 years ago)22 August 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$215no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3580 and E-450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.65 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size263 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3580 and E-450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3580 and E-450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3580 and E-450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3580 and E-450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3580 and E-450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon HD 6320

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3580 and E-450.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3580 3609
+372%
E-450 765

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W3580 607
+457%
E-450 109

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W3580 2417
+1266%
E-450 177

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2009 22 August 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 18 Watt

Xeon W3580 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

E-450, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 622.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3580 and E-450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W3580 is a server/workstation processor while E-450 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3580 and E-450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3580
Xeon W3580
AMD E-450
E-450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Xeon W3580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 536 votes

Rate E-450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3580 or E-450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.