Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs W3565

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3565
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.12
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.39
+1286%

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms Xeon W3565 by a whopping 1286% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3565 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1874148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.66no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.5410.30
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 November 2009 (15 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3565 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)38
Threads876
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3565 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3565 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W3565 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3565 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3565 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size24 GB6 TB
Max memory channels38
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3565 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3565 2.12
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 29.39
+1286%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3565 3375
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
+1283%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.12 29.39
Recency 1 November 2009 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 38
Threads 8 76
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon W3565 has 107.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q, on the other hand, has a 1286.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 850% more physical cores and 850% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3565 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3565 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3565
Xeon W3565
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 81 vote

Rate Xeon W3565 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3565 or Xeon Platinum 8368Q, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.