i3-9100F vs Xeon W3565

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3565
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.16
Core i3-9100F
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.32
+100%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Xeon W3565 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3565 and Core i3-9100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18621369
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.669.91
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.546.17
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date1 November 2009 (15 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-9100F has 75% better value for money than Xeon W3565.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3565 and Core i3-9100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3565 and Core i3-9100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3565 and Core i3-9100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3565 and Core i3-9100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3565 and Core i3-9100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3565 and Core i3-9100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size24 GB64 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3565 and Core i3-9100F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3565 2.16
i3-9100F 4.32
+100%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3565 3366
i3-9100F 6735
+100%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W3565 488
i3-9100F 1395
+186%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W3565 1672
i3-9100F 3724
+123%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 4.32
Recency 1 November 2009 23 April 2019
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W3565 has 100% more threads.

i3-9100F, on the other hand, has a 100% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-9100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3565 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W3565 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-9100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3565 and Core i3-9100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3565
Xeon W3565
Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 79 votes

Rate Xeon W3565 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6968 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3565 or Core i3-9100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.