Celeron 797 vs Xeon W3550

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3550 and Celeron 797 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1899not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.59no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.48no data
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date9 August 2009 (15 years ago)1 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$235$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3550 and Celeron 797 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.06 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)1.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size263 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Number of transistors731 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3550 and Celeron 797 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366Intel BGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3550 and Celeron 797. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE36 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon W3550 and Celeron 797 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3550 and Celeron 797 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3550 and Celeron 797. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GB16 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W3550 and Celeron 797 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3550 and Celeron 797.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2009 1 January 2012
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon W3550 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron 797, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 664.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3550 and Celeron 797. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W3550 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 797 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3550 and Celeron 797, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3550
Xeon W3550
Intel Celeron 797
Celeron 797

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 81 vote

Rate Xeon W3550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 797 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3550 or Celeron 797, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.