Athlon 64 3000+ vs Xeon W3550

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3550 and Athlon 64 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1902not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.58no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.48no data
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date9 August 2009 (15 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$235$65

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3550 and Athlon 64 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.06 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size263 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3550 and Athlon 64 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366754
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3550 and Athlon 64 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3550 and Athlon 64 3000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3550 and Athlon 64 3000+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3550 and Athlon 64 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3550 and Athlon 64 3000+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3550 3227
+866%
Athlon 64 3000+ 334

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 89 Watt

Xeon W3550 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 3000+, on the other hand, has 46.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3550 and Athlon 64 3000+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W3550 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 3000+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3550 and Athlon 64 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3550
Xeon W3550
AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Athlon 64 3000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 82 votes

Rate Xeon W3550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 114 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3550 or Athlon 64 3000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.