A9-9420e vs Xeon W3550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3550
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.03
+190%
A9-9420e
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.70

Xeon W3550 outperforms A9-9420e by a whopping 190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3550 and A9-9420e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19022705
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.57no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.484.42
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date9 August 2009 (15 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$235no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3550 and A9-9420e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.06 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.33 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size263 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C90 °C
Number of transistors731 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3550 and A9-9420e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1366BGA
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3550 and A9-9420e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Virtualization,
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3550 and A9-9420e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3550 and A9-9420e are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3550 and A9-9420e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3550 and A9-9420e.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3550 2.03
+190%
A9-9420e 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3550 3227
+192%
A9-9420e 1107

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 0.70
Recency 9 August 2009 1 June 2018
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon W3550 has a 190% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

A9-9420e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W3550 is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9420e in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W3550 is a server/workstation processor while A9-9420e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3550 and A9-9420e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3550
Xeon W3550
AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 82 votes

Rate Xeon W3550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 149 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3550 or A9-9420e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.