i7-10700 vs Xeon W3520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.84
Core i7-10700
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.29
+459%

Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon W3520 by a whopping 459% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2005760
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3214.48
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.3414.98
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$404$340

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-10700 has 4425% better value for money than Xeon W3520.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size24 GB128 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s45.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.2 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3520 1.84
i7-10700 10.29
+459%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3520 2920
i7-10700 16343
+460%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W3520 413
i7-10700 1628
+294%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W3520 1421
i7-10700 7144
+403%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.84 10.29
Recency 30 March 2009 30 April 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

i7-10700 has a 459.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-10700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3520 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W3520 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-10700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3520 and Core i7-10700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3520
Xeon W3520
Intel Core i7-10700
Core i7-10700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 120 votes

Rate Xeon W3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1231 vote

Rate Core i7-10700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3520 or Core i7-10700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.