Atom N2800 vs Xeon W3520

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3520 and Atom N2800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1989	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.27	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Atom
Power efficiency	1.34	no data
Architecture codename	Bloomfield (2008−2010)	Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date	30 March 2009 (15 years ago)	1 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$404	$47

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3520 and Atom N2800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	8	4
Base clock speed	2.66 GHz	1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.93 GHz	1.87 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	8 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	45 nm	32 nm
Die size	263 mm2	66 mm2
Maximum core temperature	68 °C	no data
Number of transistors	731 million	176 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3520 and Atom N2800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1366	FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3520 and Atom N2800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Demand Based Switching	+	-
PAE	36 Bit	no data

Security technologies

Xeon W3520 and Atom N2800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	-
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3520 and Atom N2800 are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	-
VT-x	+	-
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3520 and Atom N2800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	24 GB	4.88 GB
Max memory channels	3	1
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3520 and Atom N2800.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	30 March 2009	1 December 2011
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	8	4
Chip lithography	45 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	6 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3520 and Atom N2800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---