A8-3530MX vs Xeon W3505

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3505
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.73
A8-3530MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.02
+39.7%

A8-3530MX outperforms Xeon W3505 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3505 and A8-3530MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26712447
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency0.532.14
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3505 and A8-3530MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.53 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.53 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size263 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors731 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.8V-1.225Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3505 and A8-3530MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1366FS1
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3505 and A8-3530MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.23DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3505 and A8-3530MX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3505 and A8-3530MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3505 and A8-3530MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon HD 6620G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3505 and A8-3530MX.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3505 0.73
A8-3530MX 1.02
+39.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3505 1161
A8-3530MX 1608
+38.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 1.02
Recency 30 March 2009 14 June 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 45 Watt

A8-3530MX has a 39.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 188.9% lower power consumption.

The A8-3530MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3505 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W3505 is a server/workstation processor while A8-3530MX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3505 and A8-3530MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3505
Xeon W3505
AMD A8-3530MX
A8-3530MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon W3505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 66 votes

Rate A8-3530MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3505 or A8-3530MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.