Xeon Gold 6526Y vs W-3375

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3375
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
37.20
+28.4%
Xeon Gold 6526Y
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 195 Watt
28.97

Xeon W-3375 outperforms Xeon Gold 6526Y by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6526Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking87154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.15
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.0414.06
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,517

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6526Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3816 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads7632
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)37.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °C82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6526Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt195 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6526Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6526Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6526Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6526Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6526Y.

PCIe version45.0
PCI Express lanes6480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3375 37.20
+28.4%
Xeon Gold 6526Y 28.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3375 59091
+28.4%
Xeon Gold 6526Y 46025

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.20 28.97
Recency 29 July 2021 14 December 2023
Physical cores 38 16
Threads 76 32
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 195 Watt

Xeon W-3375 has a 28.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 137.5% more physical cores and 137.5% more threads.

Xeon Gold 6526Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 38.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6526Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3375 and Xeon Gold 6526Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375
Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y
Xeon Gold 6526Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 12 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6526Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3375 or Xeon Gold 6526Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.