Xeon Gold 6416H vs W-3335

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3335
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 250 Watt
24.74
Xeon Gold 6416H
2023
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
25.56
+3.3%

Xeon Gold 6416H outperforms Xeon W-3335 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3335 and Xeon Gold 6416H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking199191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.43
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency9.3714.66
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,444

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3335 and Xeon Gold 6416H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads3236
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)45 MB
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °C82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3335 and Xeon Gold 6416H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon Gold 6416H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3335 and Xeon Gold 6416H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon Gold 6416H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon Gold 6416H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TB4 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon Gold 6416H.

PCIe version45
PCI Express lanes6480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3335 24.74
Xeon Gold 6416H 25.56
+3.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3335 39293
Xeon Gold 6416H 40606
+3.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.74 25.56
Recency 29 July 2021 10 January 2023
Physical cores 16 18
Threads 32 36
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon Gold 6416H has a 3.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 12.5% more physical cores and 12.5% more threads, and 51.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-3335 and Xeon Gold 6416H.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3335 and Xeon Gold 6416H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3335
Xeon W-3335
Intel Xeon Gold 6416H
Xeon Gold 6416H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6416H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3335 or Xeon Gold 6416H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.