Xeon E-2314 vs W-3335

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3335
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 250 Watt
24.74
+382%
Xeon E-2314
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
5.13

Xeon W-3335 outperforms Xeon E-2314 by a whopping 382% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3335 and Xeon E-2314 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2041212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency9.377.47
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3335 and Xeon E-2314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3335 and Xeon E-2314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon E-2314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3335 and Xeon E-2314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon E-2314 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon E-2314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TB128 GB
Max memory channels82
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3335 and Xeon E-2314.

PCIe version44.0
PCI Express lanes6444

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3335 24.74
+382%
Xeon E-2314 5.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3335 39293
+382%
Xeon E-2314 8146

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.74 5.13
Recency 29 July 2021 8 September 2021
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-3335 has a 382.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E-2314, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 284.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3335 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2314 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3335 and Xeon E-2314, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3335
Xeon W-3335
Intel Xeon E-2314
Xeon E-2314

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon E-2314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3335 or Xeon E-2314, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.