EPYC 9655P vs Xeon W-3335

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3335
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 250 Watt
24.74
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+304%

EPYC 9655P outperforms Xeon W-3335 by a whopping 304% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3335 and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.62
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency9.3723.66
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Turin (2024)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3335 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)96
Threads32192
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data12x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3335 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189SP5
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3335 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3335 and EPYC 9655P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3335 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3335 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3335 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version45.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3335 24.74
EPYC 9655P 100.00
+304%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3335 39293
EPYC 9655P 158845
+304%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.74 100.00
Recency 29 July 2021 10 October 2024
Physical cores 16 96
Threads 32 192
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 400 Watt

Xeon W-3335 has 60% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 304.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3335 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3335 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3335
Xeon W-3335
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 213 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3335 or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.