Ryzen 7 7700 vs Xeon W-3323

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3323
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 220 Watt
16.29
Ryzen 7 7700
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
21.81
+33.9%

Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms Xeon W-3323 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 7700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking403238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.72
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency7.0131.75
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)14 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 7700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 7700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189AM5
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt65W, (85W real world)

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 7700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-5125 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 7700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 7700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 7700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size4 TB128 GB
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 7700.

PCIe version45.0
PCI Express lanes6424

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3323 16.29
Ryzen 7 7700 21.81
+33.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3323 25875
Ryzen 7 7700 34644
+33.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.29 21.81
Recency 29 July 2021 14 January 2023
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-3323 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 7 7700, on the other hand, has a 33.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 238.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3323 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3323 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 7700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
Ryzen 7 7700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 21 vote

Rate Xeon W-3323 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1423 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3323 or Ryzen 7 7700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.