Celeron N6211 vs Xeon W-3323

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3323
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 220 Watt
16.91
+1050%

Xeon W-3323 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 1050% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3323 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3992191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataElkhart Lake
Power efficiency7.0120.62
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3323 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache18 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3323 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4189BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3323 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3323 and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3323 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3323 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3323 and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version4no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3323 16.91
+1050%
Celeron N6211 1.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3323 25875
+1053%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.91 1.47
Recency 29 July 2021 17 July 2022
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon W-3323 has a 1050.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 3566.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3323 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3323 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3323 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 21 vote

Rate Xeon W-3323 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3323 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.