Xeon E5-1680 v2 vs W-3275M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.02
+215%
Xeon E5-1680 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
7.94

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Xeon E5-1680 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking197940
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.02no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.555.78
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)10 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon E5-1680 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads5616
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s0 GT/s
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data341 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage rangeno data0.65–1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Xeon E5-1680 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon E5-1680 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0+
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon E5-1680 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon E5-1680 v2 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon E5-1680 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size2 TB256 GB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s59.7 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon E5-1680 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6440

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.02
+215%
Xeon E5-1680 v2 7.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 39736
+215%
Xeon E5-1680 v2 12609

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3275M 1219
+81.9%
Xeon E5-1680 v2 670

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3275M 12239
+197%
Xeon E5-1680 v2 4114

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.02 7.94
Recency 3 June 2019 10 September 2013
Physical cores 28 8
Threads 56 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 215.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-1680 v2, on the other hand, has 57.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1680 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Xeon E5-1680 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
Xeon E5-1680 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 148 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1680 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Xeon E5-1680 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.