Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon W-3275M

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	193	66
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.96	no data
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Xeon W	AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency	11.58	13.32
Architecture codename	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)	Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)	14 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$7,453	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	28 (Octacosa-Core)	32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads	56	64
Base clock speed	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.6 GHz	4.2 GHz
Bus type	DMI 3.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	25	35
L1 cache	1.75 MB	2 MB
L2 cache	28 MB	16 MB
L3 cache	38.5 MB	128 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Die size	no data	74 mm2
Maximum core temperature	76 °C	95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	95 °C
Number of transistors	no data	23540 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCLGA3647	sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX-512	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Speed Shift	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	+	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+
Deep Learning Boost	+	-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2933	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	2 TB	2 TiB
Max memory channels	6	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	140.8 GB/s	204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.

PCIe version	3.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	64	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	26.03	40.89
Recency	3 June 2019	14 July 2020
Physical cores	28	32
Threads	56	64
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	280 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---