i5-14400F vs Xeon W-3275M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.35
+55.8%
Core i5-14400F
2024
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.27

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core i5-14400F by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Core i5-14400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking201412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.0760.48
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.7023.69
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-14400F has 1093% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Core i5-14400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads5616
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data215 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Core i5-14400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core i5-14400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Core i5-14400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core i5-14400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core i5-14400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core i5-14400F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.35
+55.8%
i5-14400F 16.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 40261
+55.8%
i5-14400F 25841

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3275M 1219
i5-14400F 2342
+92.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3275M 12239
+7.2%
i5-14400F 11419

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.35 16.27
Recency 3 June 2019 8 January 2024
Physical cores 28 10
Threads 56 16
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 55.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 180% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

i5-14400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-14400F in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-14400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Core i5-14400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Core i5-14400F
Core i5-14400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 614 votes

Rate Core i5-14400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Core i5-14400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.