Ultra 7 165H vs Xeon W-3275M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.15
+52%
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
16.55

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core Ultra 7 165H by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking198391
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.03no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency11.6155.94
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453$460

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads5622
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 4 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TB96 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.3 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes648
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.15
+52%
Ultra 7 165H 16.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 39946
+51.9%
Ultra 7 165H 26289

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.15 16.55
Recency 3 June 2019 14 December 2023
Physical cores 28 16
Threads 56 22
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 52% higher aggregate performance score, and 75% more physical cores and 154.5% more threads.

Ultra 7 165H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 632.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 165H in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 165H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Core Ultra 7 165H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 44 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Core Ultra 7 165H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.