Celeron 3867U vs Xeon W-3275M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.49
+2612%
Celeron 3867U
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.94

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Celeron 3867U by a whopping 2612% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1972511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.98no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Celeron
Power efficiency11.555.82
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)1 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads562
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 GT/s
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB128 KB
L2 cache28 MB512 KB
L3 cache38.5 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA1356,FC-BGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size2 TB32 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6412

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.49
+2612%
Celeron 3867U 0.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 39736
+2609%
Celeron 3867U 1467

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3275M 1219
+247%
Celeron 3867U 351

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3275M 12239
+1840%
Celeron 3867U 631

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.49 0.94
Recency 3 June 2019 1 March 2019
Physical cores 28 2
Threads 56 2
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 2611.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.

Celeron 3867U, on the other hand, has 1266.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3867U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 3867U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Celeron 3867U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Celeron 3867U
Celeron 3867U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 63 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 20 votes

Rate Celeron 3867U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Celeron 3867U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.