i5-13400F vs Xeon W-3275

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.75
+62.6%

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Core i5-13400F by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275 and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking188419
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.5055.43
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.9023.08
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-13400F has 382% better value for money than Xeon W-3275.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads5616
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5, DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core i5-13400F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275 26.75
+62.6%
i5-13400F 16.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275 40931
+62.6%
i5-13400F 25180

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.75 16.45
Recency 3 June 2019 4 January 2023
Physical cores 28 10
Threads 56 16
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-3275 has a 62.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 180% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

i5-13400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-13400F in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275 and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3094 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275 or Core i5-13400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.