Ultra 9 285T vs Xeon W-3275

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 9 285T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking190not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.33no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.90no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 9 285T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads5624
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 9 285T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA36471851
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 9 285T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 9 285T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 9 285T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 9 285T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 9 285T.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 28 24
Threads 56 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon W-3275 has 16.7% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.

Ultra 9 285T, on the other hand, has a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 485.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 9 285T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 9 285T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
Core Ultra 9 285T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 9 285T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275 or Core Ultra 9 285T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.