Ultra 5 236V vs Xeon W-3275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.77
+91%
Core Ultra 5 236V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
13.49

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Core Ultra 5 236V by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking195557
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.16no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.8975.05
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads568
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s37 MHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA2833
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TB16 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Arc Graphics 130V
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.85 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes644
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.77 13.49
Recency 3 June 2019 24 September 2024
Physical cores 28 8
Threads 56 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon W-3275 has a 91% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

Ultra 5 236V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1105.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 236V in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 236V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275 and Core Ultra 5 236V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V
Core Ultra 5 236V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 5 236V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275 or Core Ultra 5 236V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.