Apple M3 Pro 11-Core vs Xeon W-3275

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.75
+65.2%
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
2023
11 cores / 11 threads, 27 Watt
16.19

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Apple M3 Pro 11-Core by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275 and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking188435
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.49no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WApple M3
Power efficiency11.9054.68
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)11 (Undeca-Core)
Threads5611
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.06 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MBno data
L2 cache28 MBno data
L3 cache38.5 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data37000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275 26.75
+65.2%
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 16.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275 40931
+65.2%
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 24781

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.75 16.19
Recency 3 June 2019 30 October 2023
Physical cores 28 11
Threads 56 11
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 27 Watt

Xeon W-3275 has a 65.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 154.5% more physical cores and 409.1% more threads.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 659.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Pro 11-Core in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Pro 11-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275 and Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
M3 Pro 11-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 91 vote

Rate Apple M3 Pro 11-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275 or Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.