EPYC 7573X vs Xeon W-3265M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
22.09
EPYC 7573X
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
45.37
+105%

EPYC 7573X outperforms Xeon W-3265M by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24947
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.92no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency9.8314.78
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Milan-X (2022)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,353no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads4864
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache33 MB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7573X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7573X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265M 22.09
EPYC 7573X 45.37
+105%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3265M 33800
EPYC 7573X 69432
+105%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.09 45.37
Recency 3 June 2019 22 March 2022
Physical cores 24 32
Threads 48 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon W-3265M has 36.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7573X, on the other hand, has a 105.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3265M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7573X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M
AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265M or EPYC 7573X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.