EPYC 7252 vs Xeon W-3265M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
22.09
+74.2%

Xeon W-3265M outperforms EPYC 7252 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7252 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking249621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.9211.27
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Power efficiency9.839.64
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,353$475

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7252 has 90% better value for money than Xeon W-3265M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7252 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2731
L1 cache1.5 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache33 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7252 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7252. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7252 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7252 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7252. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size2 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7252.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265M 22.09
+74.2%
EPYC 7252 12.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3265M 33800
+74.1%
EPYC 7252 19411

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.09 12.68
Recency 3 June 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon W-3265M has a 74.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

EPYC 7252, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 70.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3265M is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7252 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7252, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M
AMD EPYC 7252
EPYC 7252

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265M or EPYC 7252, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.