Xeon w5-3425 vs W-3265

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
18.95
Xeon w5-3425
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 270 Watt
23.21
+22.5%

Xeon w5-3425 outperforms Xeon W-3265 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265 and Xeon w5-3425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking308221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.4052.53
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency8.758.14
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,349$1,189

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w5-3425 has 459% better value for money than Xeon W-3265.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265 and Xeon w5-3425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265 and Xeon w5-3425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon w5-3425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265 and Xeon w5-3425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon w5-3425 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon w5-3425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon w5-3425.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes64112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265 18.95
Xeon w5-3425 23.21
+22.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3265 30105
Xeon w5-3425 36867
+22.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.95 23.21
Recency 3 June 2019 15 February 2023
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon W-3265 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 31.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-3425, on the other hand, has a 22.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The Xeon w5-3425 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3265 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265 and Xeon w5-3425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265
Xeon W-3265
Intel Xeon w5-3425
Xeon w5-3425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5 votes

Rate Xeon w5-3425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265 or Xeon w5-3425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.