Xeon D-2796TE vs W-3265

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
19.67
+14.3%

Xeon W-3265 outperforms Xeon D-2796TE by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265 and Xeon D-2796TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking306390
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.5218.93
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency8.7513.30
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)24 February 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,349$2,101

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon D-2796TE has 99% better value for money than Xeon W-3265.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265 and Xeon D-2796TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads4840
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265 and Xeon D-2796TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt118 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon D-2796TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265 and Xeon D-2796TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon D-2796TE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon D-2796TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TB1 TB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon D-2796TE.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes6432
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265 19.67
+14.3%
Xeon D-2796TE 17.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3265 30105
+14.3%
Xeon D-2796TE 26342

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.67 17.21
Recency 3 June 2019 24 February 2022
Physical cores 24 20
Threads 48 40
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 118 Watt

Xeon W-3265 has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% more physical cores and 20% more threads.

Xeon D-2796TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 73.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3265 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-2796TE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265 and Xeon D-2796TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265
Xeon W-3265
Intel Xeon D-2796TE
Xeon D-2796TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2796TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265 or Xeon D-2796TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.