Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon W-3265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
19.67
+3.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
19.08

Xeon W-3265 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking302318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.56no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency8.7538.66
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,349no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FP7
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265 19.67
+3.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS 19.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3265 30105
+3.1%
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS 29199

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.67 19.08
Recency 3 June 2019 16 April 2024
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon W-3265 has a 3.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 355.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265
Xeon W-3265
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 13 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265 or Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.