Xeon w5-2545 vs W-3245M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3245M
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 205 Watt
16.88
Xeon w5-2545
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 210 Watt
26.24
+55.5%

Xeon w5-2545 outperforms Xeon W-3245M by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3245M and Xeon w5-2545 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking390188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.2283.24
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency7.7911.82
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,002$889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w5-2545 has 1495% better value for money than Xeon W-3245M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3245M and Xeon w5-2545 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache1 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache22 MB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3245M and Xeon w5-2545 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3245M and Xeon w5-2545. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3245M and Xeon w5-2545 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3245M and Xeon w5-2545 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3245M and Xeon w5-2545. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TB2 TB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3245M and Xeon w5-2545.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3245M 16.88
Xeon w5-2545 26.24
+55.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3245M 26814
Xeon w5-2545 41688
+55.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.88 26.24
Recency 3 June 2019 24 August 2024
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 24
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 210 Watt

Xeon W-3245M has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 2.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-2545, on the other hand, has a 55.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The Xeon w5-2545 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3245M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3245M and Xeon w5-2545, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3245M
Xeon W-3245M
Intel Xeon w5-2545
Xeon w5-2545

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon W-3245M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon w5-2545 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3245M or Xeon w5-2545, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.