EPYC 7343 vs Xeon W-3235

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3235
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.71
EPYC 7343
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
28.46
+70.3%

EPYC 7343 outperforms Xeon W-3235 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7343 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking410174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.9313.21
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.4713.66
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,398$1,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3235 has 36% better value for money than EPYC 7343.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7343 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3332
L1 cache768 KB1 MB
L2 cache12 MB8 MB
L3 cache19.25 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7343 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt190 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7343. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7343 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7343 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7343. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7343.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3235 16.71
EPYC 7343 28.46
+70.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3235 25578
EPYC 7343 43561
+70.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3235 1447
EPYC 7343 1533
+5.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3235 10448
EPYC 7343 11934
+14.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.71 28.46
Recency 3 June 2019 12 January 2021
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 24 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 190 Watt

Xeon W-3235 has 5.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7343, on the other hand, has a 70.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7343 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3235 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7343, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235
AMD EPYC 7343
EPYC 7343

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7343 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3235 or EPYC 7343, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.