EPYC 7303P vs Xeon W-3235

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7303P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking413not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.75no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency8.46no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)5 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,398$594

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7303P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data8,300 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7303P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7303P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7303P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7303P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7303P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7303P.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2019 5 September 2023
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 24 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 130 Watt

EPYC 7303P has an age advantage of 4 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 38.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7303P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3235 and EPYC 7303P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235
AMD EPYC 7303P
EPYC 7303P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7303P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3235 or EPYC 7303P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.