Apple M4 (8 cores) vs Xeon W-3235

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3235 and Apple M4 (8 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking416not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.52no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon WApple M4
Power efficiency8.42no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)28 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,398no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3235 and Apple M4 (8 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache12 MBno data
L3 cache19.25 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3235 and Apple M4 (8 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3235 and Apple M4 (8 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3235 and Apple M4 (8 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3235 and Apple M4 (8 cores) are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3235 and Apple M4 (8 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 8-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3235 and Apple M4 (8 cores).

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2019 28 October 2024
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 5 Watt

Xeon W-3235 has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Apple M4 (8 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 3500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3235 and Apple M4 (8 cores). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W-3235 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 (8 cores) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3235 and Apple M4 (8 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235
Apple M4 (8 cores)
M4 (8 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 (8 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3235 or Apple M4 (8 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.