Xeon W-3275M vs W-3225

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3225
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
11.25
Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.02
+122%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Xeon W-3225 by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3225 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking688197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.465.02
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency6.6511.55
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199$7,453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3225 has 148% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3225 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads1656
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3725
L1 cache512 KB1.75 MB
L2 cache8 MB28 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB38.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature68 °C76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3225 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3225 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1 TB2 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3225 11.25
Xeon W-3275M 25.02
+122%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3225 17874
Xeon W-3275M 39736
+122%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.25 25.02
Physical cores 8 28
Threads 16 56
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 205 Watt

Xeon W-3225 has 28.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3275M, on the other hand, has a 122.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3225 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3225 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3225
Xeon W-3225
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3225 or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.