Processor N200 vs Xeon W-3225

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3225
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
11.25
+621%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

Xeon W-3225 outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 621% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3225 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6872107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.48no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency6.6524.61
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3225 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.7 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache512 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache16.5 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature68 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3225 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3225 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3225 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3225 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3225 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3225 and Processor N200.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes649

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.25 1.56
Recency 3 June 2019 3 January 2023
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon W-3225 has a 621.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 2566.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3225 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3225 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3225 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3225
Xeon W-3225
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 145 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3225 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.