Ryzen 9 5900X vs Xeon W-3223

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3223
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
10.70
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
24.62
+130%

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon W-3223 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 5900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking726201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.6330.90
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency6.3322.19
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)5 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$749$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 5900X has 66% better value for money than Xeon W-3223.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 5900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3537
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB64 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data2x 74 mm2(CCD) + 125 mm2 (IOD)
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data0 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 5900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM4
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 5900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-51286x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 5900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 5900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 5900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 5900X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3223 10.70
Ryzen 9 5900X 24.62
+130%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3223 17003
Ryzen 9 5900X 39114
+130%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3223 1371
Ryzen 9 5900X 2209
+61.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3223 8125
Ryzen 9 5900X 11957
+47.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.70 24.62
Recency 3 June 2019 5 November 2020
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 105 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900X has a 130.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 52.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 5900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3223 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3223 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 5900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 5900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3223
Xeon W-3223
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3223 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 3687 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3223 or Ryzen 9 5900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.