Xeon W-3323 vs W-3175X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3175X
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 255 Watt
24.29
+43.6%

Xeon W-3175X outperforms Xeon W-3323 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3323 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking214399
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.01no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency8.697.01
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date8 October 2018 (6 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3323 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads5624
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache1.75 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3323 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3323. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3323 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3323 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3323. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size512 GB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3323.

PCIe version3.04
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3175X 24.29
+43.6%
Xeon W-3323 16.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3175X 37167
+43.6%
Xeon W-3323 25875

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.29 16.91
Recency 8 October 2018 29 July 2021
Physical cores 28 12
Threads 56 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 220 Watt

Xeon W-3175X has a 43.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.

Xeon W-3323, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 15.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3175X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3323 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3323, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X
Intel Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 118 votes

Rate Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 21 vote

Rate Xeon W-3323 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3175X or Xeon W-3323, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.