Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Xeon W-3175X

Place in the ranking	183	68
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	16.44	56.78
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Xeon W	AMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency	10.02	31.03
Architecture codename	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date	19 December 2018 (6 years ago)	4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 245% better value for money than Xeon W-3175X.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen 9 7950X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	28 (Octacosa-Core)	16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads	56	32
Base clock speed	3.1 GHz	4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	5.7 GHz
Bus type	DMI 3.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 8 GT/s	64K (per core)
Multiplier	31	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	1024 KB
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	16 MB
L3 cache	38.5 MB (shared)	128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm, 6 nm
Die size	no data	71+71+122 mm
Maximum core temperature	85 °C	89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	47 °C
Number of transistors	8,000 million	13,140 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	+	+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen 9 7950X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCLGA3647	AM5
Power consumption (TDP)	255 Watt	120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512	86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Speed Shift	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen 9 7950X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen 9 7950X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2666	DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size	512 GB	128 GB
Max memory channels	6	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	128.001 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

PCIe version	3.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	48	24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3175X 27.01

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 39.35
+45.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3175X 42900

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 62509
+45.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3175X 1466

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2929
+99.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3175X 14191

Ryzen 9 7950X3D 19681
+38.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	27.01	39.35
Recency	19 December 2018	4 January 2023
Physical cores	28	16
Threads	56	32
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	255 Watt	120 Watt

Xeon W-3175X has 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D, on the other hand, has a 45.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 112.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3175X in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3175X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen 9 7950X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.