Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs W-2295

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2295
2019
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
19.35
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.39
+51.9%

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms Xeon W-2295 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking293147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency11.1010.30
Architecture codenameno dataIce Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 October 2019 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)38
Threads3676
Base clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth93.85 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2295 19.35
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 29.39
+51.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2295 30735
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
+51.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.35 29.39
Recency 1 October 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 18 38
Threads 36 76
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon W-2295 has 63.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q, on the other hand, has a 51.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 111.1% more physical cores and 111.1% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2295 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2295
Xeon W-2295
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 31 vote

Rate Xeon W-2295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2295 or Xeon Platinum 8368Q, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.