Xeon Platinum 8163 vs W-2295
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8163 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 293 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | no data | Intel Xeon Platinum |
Power efficiency | 11.09 | no data |
Architecture codename | no data | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
Release date | 1 October 2019 (5 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8163 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 18 (Octadeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | 36 | 48 |
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | no data | 25 |
L1 cache | no data | 1.5 MB |
L2 cache | no data | 24 MB |
L3 cache | 24.75 MB | 33 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8163 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | FCLGA2066 | Socket P |
Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8163. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 46 Bit | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8163 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | - | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8163 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8163. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 768 GB |
Max memory channels | 4 | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 93.85 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8163.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 18 | 24 |
Threads | 36 | 48 |
Xeon Platinum 8163 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8163. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2295 and Xeon Platinum 8163, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.