Ryzen 5 3580U vs Xeon W-2245

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2245
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
12.30
+169%
Ryzen 5 3580U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.57

Xeon W-2245 outperforms Ryzen 5 3580U by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2245 and Ryzen 5 3580U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6201297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency7.4828.71
Architecture codenameno dataPicasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release date1 October 2019 (5 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2245 and Ryzen 5 3580U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data21
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature59 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2245 and Ryzen 5 3580U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066FP5
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2245 and Ryzen 5 3580U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-2245 and Ryzen 5 3580U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2245 and Ryzen 5 3580U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2245 and Ryzen 5 3580U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth93.85 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 9

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2245 and Ryzen 5 3580U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4812

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2245 12.30
+169%
Ryzen 5 3580U 4.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2245 19470
+169%
Ryzen 5 3580U 7236

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.30 4.57
Recency 1 October 2019 6 January 2019
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon W-2245 has a 169.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 5 3580U, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 933.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-2245 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3580U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-2245 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3580U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2245 and Ryzen 5 3580U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2245
Xeon W-2245
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
Ryzen 5 3580U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 21 vote

Rate Xeon W-2245 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 34 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3580U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2245 or Ryzen 5 3580U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.