Xeon E5-2628 V3 vs W-2195

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2195
2017
18 cores / 36 threads, 140 Watt
17.63
+231%
Xeon E5-2628 V3
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
5.32

Xeon W-2195 outperforms Xeon E5-2628 V3 by a whopping 231% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2195 and Xeon E5-2628 V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3481171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.12no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.925.92
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date29 September 2017 (7 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,553no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2195 and Xeon E5-2628 V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3616
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data356 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2195 and Xeon E5-2628 V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSocket R42011-3
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2195 and Xeon E5-2628 V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-2195 and Xeon E5-2628 V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2195 and Xeon E5-2628 V3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2195 and Xeon E5-2628 V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size512 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2195 and Xeon E5-2628 V3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2195 17.63
+231%
Xeon E5-2628 V3 5.32

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2195 28002
+232%
Xeon E5-2628 V3 8447

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.63 5.32
Recency 29 September 2017 8 September 2014
Physical cores 18 8
Threads 36 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon W-2195 has a 231.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2628 V3, on the other hand, has 64.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-2195 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2628 V3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2195 and Xeon E5-2628 V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2195
Xeon W-2195
Intel Xeon E5-2628 V3
Xeon E5-2628 V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 30 votes

Rate Xeon W-2195 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2628 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2195 or Xeon E5-2628 V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.