EPYC 7601 vs Xeon W-2195

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2195
2017
18 cores / 36 threads, 140 Watt
18.30
EPYC 7601
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
22.27
+21.7%

EPYC 7601 outperforms Xeon W-2195 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7601 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking347246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.121.69
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Power efficiency11.9211.28
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,553$4,200

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-2195 has 321% better value for money than EPYC 7601.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7601 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3664
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2322
L1 cache1.125 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache18 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7601 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSocket R4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7601. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7601 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7601 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7601. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size512 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7601.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2195 18.30
EPYC 7601 22.27
+21.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2195 28005
EPYC 7601 34079
+21.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-2195 1329
+67.8%
EPYC 7601 792

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-2195 9746
+26.6%
EPYC 7601 7699

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.30 22.27
Recency 29 August 2017 29 June 2017
Physical cores 18 32
Threads 36 64
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon W-2195 has an age advantage of 2 months, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7601, on the other hand, has a 21.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 77.8% more physical cores and 77.8% more threads.

The EPYC 7601 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2195 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7601, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2195
Xeon W-2195
AMD EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 30 votes

Rate Xeon W-2195 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 24 votes

Rate EPYC 7601 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2195 or EPYC 7601, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.