EPYC 7502 vs Xeon W-2195

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2195
2017
18 cores / 36 threads, 140 Watt
17.63
EPYC 7502
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
30.21
+71.4%

EPYC 7502 outperforms Xeon W-2195 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7502 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking355140
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.957.70
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Power efficiency11.9215.88
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date29 September 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,553$2,600

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7502 has 11% better value for money than Xeon W-2195.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7502 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3664
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2325
L1 cache64K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7502 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSocket R4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7502. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7502 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7502 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7502. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size512 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7502.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2195 17.63
EPYC 7502 30.21
+71.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2195 28002
EPYC 7502 47983
+71.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.63 30.21
Recency 29 September 2017 7 August 2019
Physical cores 18 32
Threads 36 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon W-2195 has 28.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7502, on the other hand, has a 71.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 77.8% more physical cores and 77.8% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7502 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2195 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2195 and EPYC 7502, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2195
Xeon W-2195
AMD EPYC 7502
EPYC 7502

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 30 votes

Rate Xeon W-2195 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2195 or EPYC 7502, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.