Apple M1 vs Xeon W-2191B

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2191B
2017
18 cores / 36 threads, 140 Watt
17.62
+241%

Xeon W-2191B outperforms Apple M1 by a whopping 241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2191B and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3491192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency11.91no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)no data
Release date21 December 2017 (6 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2191B and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads368
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache64K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)66 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2191B and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socket2066no data
Power consumption (TDP)140 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2191B and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-2191B and Apple M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2191B and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2191B and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size512 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2191B and Apple M1.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2191B 17.62
+241%
Apple M1 5.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2191B 27984
+241%
Apple M1 8207

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.62 5.17
Recency 21 December 2017 10 November 2020
Physical cores 18 8
Threads 36 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Xeon W-2191B has a 240.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 125% more physical cores and 350% more threads.

Apple M1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-2191B is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-2191B is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2191B and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2191B
Xeon W-2191B
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 13 votes

Rate Xeon W-2191B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2236 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2191B or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.